Video-friendly broadband connections in the home are fast becoming the norm. There’s video on your iPod and something called “content” on your cell phone. Digital still cameras are no longer just that — most provide short MPEG movie functions. Moving pictures are everywhere. The average American family, once a single-camcorder unit at best, may now have 2.5 or more camcorders, directly proportional to the number of cell phones and/or children.

Video is literally in the hands of the people now more than ever. No longer does the press have to lie to us that you too can make a documentary for $100 and cut it on iMovie. Now it can really be done. Only it’ll play on YouTube or Google Video or the more personalized Vimeo, not at Sundance.

Press and other info outlets will claim, as They always do, that the future is now. The new horizon of video! Webisodes! Mobisodes! Podcastisodes! World peace through compressed digital video! The new big thing (even though Japan has had it for years)! These are all bloated conclusions, kind of like how the world is flat and JT LeRoy is a real person.

Instead, perhaps the current state of online, streaming and cellular video content is a step back toward the primitive, a necessary Ice Age before the Renaissance.

Forget, if you can, the portions of YouTube and Google Video that feature stolen, forwarded and re-stolen content. Forget the scenes from Family Guy uploaded by Fox and the entirely un-Google idea of charging for online video. Think more down to earth, like the talking head of a teenager, perhaps opening with an ironic “Dear Diary,” or that eventless street scene that seemed so important to shoot at the time and even more important to upload for posterity.

These are the motion pictures of, for and by the people. On the Internet, the populism of cinema becomes more fully realized.

Ironically enough, films have never really been not affordable to make. Anyone with a modicum of talent can mime in the park, but in addition to imagination cinema requires equipment, technology, and so many other costly stuffs even before reaching the vital crossroads of distribution and exhibition, with countless forks to film projection, broadcast, home video, profit, non-profit, etc. Until the recent advents in digital and wireless technologies, cinema was only populist in terms of its audience. But as the keys to making and distribution fall into our laps, what do we make? Mentos in a bottle of Diet Coke? Eat your heart out, Georges Méliès.

Arguably, the web’s videos serve little obvious purpose. They’re highly compressed picture and sound quality. Most have no plots or are abbrieviated clips. On the other hand, in form and function these small videos resemble the films shown in the early days of cinema nickelodeons and on kinetoscopes and mutoscopes in: short, sweet like candy and maybe less filling — disposable entertainment at its most primordial. But is it really disposable?

Unlike the early peep show mutoscopes, a lot of these online videos are not made for profit but simply for the entertainment of the viewer and, in many cases, of the maker. However, seen as pure celebrations of the new medium, they are cultural records of idle time — or idyll time as the case may be.

The future may be now, but do we know what to do with it?

totally

Some kind of force. Some kind of Beatles. Some kind of wonderful. I’m not really sure I can accurately describe how I feel about the Beastie Boys. It’s sort of like their music — it’s more a feeling and the creative energy that propels it. You can only put so much into words before you have to drop rhymes, drop the abstract, drop everything and devolve into a tirade of “1, 2, oh my gawd.”

As for Awesome; I Fuckin’ Shot That!, the words come easier, but the uneasy feeling of trying to define the Beastie Boys remains. The simplest fact is this: Under the usual pseudonym Nathanial Hörnblowér, Adam Yauch has put together a rocking concert film that easily rises above its democratic gimmick of giving 50 fans a camera to fire at will. The music is great, of course. The picture is interesting, if a little ADD-inducing. Song by song it evolves thematically with the breakdancing energy, unstoppable creativity and humor that one has come to expect from the Beastie Boys. It all makes for another notch in Hörnblowér’s belt that keeps him up there with another video director associated with the group, the estimable Spike Jonze.

Notice I say “keeps” him up there. Hörnblowér remains an unjustly unacknowledged presence in the history of music videos, either because of Yauch’s demure persona in interviews as he ages, or because the mainstream press dismisses Hörnblowér as a mere pseudonym (as if the band didn’t have them already). Yet what Awesome… does for Hörnblowér’s identity is immense, making him more of a collective entity and not just a wacky nom de plume. Hörnblowér is Yauch (and probably as much Ad-Rock and Mike D.). Hörnblowér is each of the 50 fan cameras. He is the rest of the professional camera crew. He is the security guards. He is the Garden’s concession vendors. He is you, me, Ben Stiller singing along in the crowd. We’re all Hörnblowér. Such is the beauty of Awesome…: collaboration. Three MC’s and one DJ. 50-some cameras and one movie. The director is not an individual, he is a unit, a commune.

Which goes in line with the film’s experiment of the 50-camera salute, the current democratization of digital video, my space, your space, putting it all into the hands of the consumer, the fans, etc. But, as evidenced in the occasional review, the experiment’s outcome does leave something to be desired. I suppose there are 50 people running around somewhere who would disagree, 50 who feel more connected to the finished product than I do. But my cynical editor side still wonders what the film might have been had it been shot entirely by fans — and, for that matter, edited by fans. That shaky shot from the nosebleeds looks kind of cool when cut in with HD footage taken by a pro on stage. And it looks extra cool when touched up and composited and cut up in such a way that could only bear the Beastie brand. Despite the great music, great picture and great nostalgia for NYC that I got from the film, the experiment only went halfway.

None of this is to say that the film isn’t still enjoyable, only that the promise of the gimmick left me wanting more. Perhaps it’s because we never really meet the 50 fans — with the exceptions of a couple voices (“Who wants to be on the DVD?”) and a quick flash in a restroom mirror — that the Hörnblowér renaissance is not fully realized.